PostgRESTvsWindows ARM
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| PostgREST | Windows ARM | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 13 in API | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 27 733 | 2 260 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +55 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 20 | 10 |
| Latest release | v16.5 · 18 Oct 2026 | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Haskell | Batchfile |
Which one should you pick?
PostgREST scores 79/100 against 61/100 for Windows ARM, so it is the safer default.
PostgREST ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Windows ARM.
If you want the quickest setup, PostgREST is easier to run; Windows ARM needs more configuration.
PostgREST is growing faster right now (+55 stars in 30 days).
PostgREST details →Windows ARM details →
Swap a project
Keep PostgREST, compare it with
Keep Windows ARM, compare it with