Hoppscotch Community EditionvsWindows ARM
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Hoppscotch Community Edition | Windows ARM | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 13 in API | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 80 705 | 2 260 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +218 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 | 10 |
| Latest release | 2026.9.0 · 30 Sept 2026 | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Batchfile |
Which one should you pick?
Hoppscotch Community Edition scores 83/100 against 61/100 for Windows ARM, so it is the safer default.
Hoppscotch Community Edition ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Windows ARM.
If you want the quickest setup, Hoppscotch Community Edition is easier to run; Windows ARM needs more configuration.
Hoppscotch Community Edition is growing faster right now (+218 stars in 30 days).
Hoppscotch Community Edition details →Windows ARM details →
Swap a project
Keep Hoppscotch Community Edition, compare it with
Keep Windows ARM, compare it with