PostgRESTvsSnitch
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| PostgREST | Snitch | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 | 54/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 13 in API | #20 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 27 733 | 639 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +55 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 20 | 10 |
| Latest release | v16.5 · 18 Oct 2026 | v1.6.4 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Haskell | Python |
Which one should you pick?
PostgREST scores 79/100 against 54/100 for Snitch, so it is the safer default.
PostgREST ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Snitch.
If you want the quickest setup, PostgREST is easier to run; Snitch needs more configuration.
PostgREST is growing faster right now (+55 stars in 30 days).
PostgREST details →Snitch details →
Swap a project
Keep PostgREST, compare it with
Keep Snitch, compare it with