PortainervsWorld Monitor
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Portainer | World Monitor | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 44 in Container Management | #5 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 38 737 | 89 717 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +188 | +2 428 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 21 | 17 |
| Latest release | 2.45.3 · 21 Oct 2026 | v2.11.6 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Zlib | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
World Monitor scores 86/100 against 77/100 for Portainer, so it is the safer default.
Portainer ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 17 for World Monitor.
If you want the quickest setup, Portainer is easier to run; World Monitor needs more configuration.
World Monitor is growing faster right now (+2 428 stars in 30 days).
Portainer details →World Monitor details →
Swap a project
Keep Portainer, compare it with
Keep World Monitor, compare it with