Portainervstemporal
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Portainer | temporal | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 83/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 44 in Container Management | #1 of 1 in Workflow |
| GitHub stars | 38 736 | 24 044 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +187 | +784 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 21 | 11 |
| Latest release | 2.45.3 · 21 Oct 2026 | v1.30.8 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Zlib | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
temporal scores 83/100 against 77/100 for Portainer, so it is the safer default.
Portainer ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for temporal.
If you want the quickest setup, Portainer is easier to run; temporal needs more configuration.
temporal is growing faster right now (+784 stars in 30 days).
Portainer details →temporal details →
Swap a project
Keep Portainer, compare it with
Keep temporal, compare it with