Ploi Roadmapvsuptime-kuma
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Ploi Roadmap | uptime-kuma | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 55/100 | 88/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 6 in Product Management | #3 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 567 | 93 050 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +-1 | +1 256 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 | 19 |
| Latest release | 4.32 · 22 Oct 2026 | 2.5.8 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | PHP | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
uptime-kuma scores 88/100 against 55/100 for Ploi Roadmap, so it is the safer default.
uptime-kuma ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 18 for Ploi Roadmap.
If you want the quickest setup, uptime-kuma is easier to run; Ploi Roadmap needs more configuration.
uptime-kuma is growing faster right now (+1 256 stars in 30 days).
Ploi Roadmap details →uptime-kuma details →
Swap a project
Keep Ploi Roadmap, compare it with
Keep uptime-kuma, compare it with