plain-appvsScada-LTS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| plain-app | Scada-LTS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 | 55/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 11 in File Transfer & Sync | #2 of 4 in Industrial IoT |
| GitHub stars | 7 085 | 1 019 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +325 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 34 | 0 |
| Latest release | v3.3.25 · 11 Sept 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Kotlin | Java |
Which one should you pick?
plain-app scores 69/100 against 55/100 for Scada-LTS, so it is the safer default.
plain-app ships more often: 34 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Scada-LTS.
If you want the quickest setup, plain-app is easier to run; Scada-LTS needs more configuration.
plain-app is growing faster right now (+325 stars in 30 days).
plain-app details →Scada-LTS details →