PairDropvsScada-LTS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| PairDrop | Scada-LTS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 | 55/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 86 in File Sharing | #2 of 4 in Industrial IoT |
| GitHub stars | 11 718 | 1 019 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +251 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Java |
Which one should you pick?
PairDrop scores 75/100 against 55/100 for Scada-LTS, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, PairDrop is easier to run; Scada-LTS needs more configuration.
PairDrop is growing faster right now (+251 stars in 30 days).
PairDrop details →Scada-LTS details →
Swap a project
Keep PairDrop, compare it with
Keep Scada-LTS, compare it with