PipraPayvsPrysm
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| PipraPay | Prysm | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 44/100 | 65/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 9 in Fintech | #2 of 18 in Blockchain |
| GitHub stars | 325 | 3 790 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +8 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 10 |
| Latest release | v3.0.0 · 24 May 2026 | v7.3.1 · 22 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | PHP | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Prysm scores 65/100 against 44/100 for PipraPay, so it is the safer default.
Prysm ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for PipraPay.
If you want the quickest setup, PipraPay is easier to run; Prysm needs more configuration.
Prysm is growing faster right now (+8 stars in 30 days).
PipraPay details →Prysm details →
Swap a project
Keep PipraPay, compare it with
Keep Prysm, compare it with