OctoBotvsPrysm
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OctoBot | Prysm | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 | 65/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 42 in Cryptocurrency | #2 of 18 in Blockchain |
| GitHub stars | 6 873 | 3 790 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +266 | +8 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 10 |
| Latest release | 2.1.1 · 30 Mar 2026 | v7.3.1 · 22 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go |
Which one should you pick?
OctoBot scores 69/100 against 65/100 for Prysm, so it is the safer default.
Prysm ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for OctoBot.
If you want the quickest setup, OctoBot is easier to run; Prysm needs more configuration.
OctoBot is growing faster right now (+266 stars in 30 days).
OctoBot details →Prysm details →
Swap a project
Keep OctoBot, compare it with
Keep Prysm, compare it with