PinchflatvsRomM
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Pinchflat | RomM | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 | 81/100 |
| Rank in category | #13 of 142 in Media Management | #1 of 5 in Emulation |
| GitHub stars | 5 430 | 14 126 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +62 | +970 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 10 |
| Latest release | — | 5.4.1 · 22 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Elixir | Python |
Which one should you pick?
RomM scores 81/100 against 65/100 for Pinchflat, so it is the safer default.
RomM ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Pinchflat.
If you want the quickest setup, Pinchflat is easier to run; RomM needs more configuration.
RomM is growing faster right now (+970 stars in 30 days).
Pinchflat details →RomM details →