Piikvstemporal
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Piik | temporal | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 83/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 4 in Live Streaming | #1 of 1 in Workflow |
| GitHub stars | 3 860 | 24 044 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +402 | +784 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 | 11 |
| Latest release | v2.5.0 · 26 Oct 2026 | v1.30.8 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
temporal scores 83/100 against 73/100 for Piik, so it is the safer default.
Piik ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for temporal.
If you want the quickest setup, Piik is easier to run; temporal needs more configuration.
Piik details →temporal details →