PiikvsSandBase Harness
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Piik | SandBase Harness | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 39/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 4 in Live Streaming | #169 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 3 886 | 636 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +428 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 | 9 |
| Latest release | v2.5.0 · 26 Oct 2026 | v0.3.8 · 30 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Piik scores 73/100 against 39/100 for SandBase Harness, so it is the safer default.
Piik ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for SandBase Harness.
If you want the quickest setup, Piik is easier to run; SandBase Harness needs more configuration.
Piik is growing faster right now (+428 stars in 30 days).
Piik details →SandBase Harness details →