Piikvsrebacklogs
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Piik | rebacklogs | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 43/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 4 in Live Streaming | #36 of 45 in Project Management |
| GitHub stars | 3 863 | 184 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +405 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 | 10 |
| Latest release | v2.5.0 · 26 Oct 2026 | v4.3.3 · 6 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Ruby |
Which one should you pick?
Piik scores 73/100 against 43/100 for rebacklogs, so it is the safer default.
Piik ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for rebacklogs.
If you want the quickest setup, Piik is easier to run; rebacklogs needs more configuration.
Piik is growing faster right now (+405 stars in 30 days).
Piik details →rebacklogs details →