pidoorsvsSeaweedFS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| pidoors | SeaweedFS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 36/100 | 81/100 |
| Rank in category | #69 of 78 in Security | #1 of 11 in Cloud Storage |
| GitHub stars | 26 | 35 799 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +838 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 28 |
| Latest release | v0.4.11 · 12 Sept 2026 | 4.51 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | — | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | PHP | Go |
Which one should you pick?
SeaweedFS scores 81/100 against 36/100 for pidoors, so it is the safer default.
SeaweedFS ships more often: 28 stable releases in the past year, against 19 for pidoors.
If you want the quickest setup, SeaweedFS is easier to run; pidoors needs more configuration.
SeaweedFS is growing faster right now (+838 stars in 30 days).
pidoors details →SeaweedFS details →
Swap a project
Keep pidoors, compare it with
Keep SeaweedFS, compare it with