pidoorsvsReactive Resume
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| pidoors | Reactive Resume | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 36/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #69 of 78 in Security | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 26 | 45 067 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +1 666 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 35 |
| Latest release | v0.4.11 · 12 Sept 2026 | v6.0.8 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | — | MIT |
| Main language | PHP | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 36/100 for pidoors, so it is the safer default.
Reactive Resume ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 19 for pidoors.
If you want the quickest setup, Reactive Resume is easier to run; pidoors needs more configuration.
Reactive Resume is growing faster right now (+1 666 stars in 30 days).
pidoors details →Reactive Resume details →
Swap a project
Keep pidoors, compare it with
Keep Reactive Resume, compare it with