Pictaria ServervsReactive Resume
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Pictaria Server | Reactive Resume | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 48/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #25 of 41 in Photo Management | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 196 | 45 054 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +1 653 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 35 |
| Latest release | v1.2.1 · 12 Sept 2026 | v6.0.8 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 48/100 for Pictaria Server, so it is the safer default.
Reactive Resume ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for Pictaria Server.
Reactive Resume is growing faster right now (+1 653 stars in 30 days).
Pictaria Server details →Reactive Resume details →
Swap a project
Keep Pictaria Server, compare it with
Keep Reactive Resume, compare it with