PicImpactvsVert
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| PicImpact | Vert | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 57/100 | 71/100 |
| Rank in category | #14 of 41 in Photo Management | #2 of 10 in File Conversion |
| GitHub stars | 1 315 | 16 162 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +532 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 0 |
| Latest release | v3.3.8 · 23 Sept 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Vert scores 71/100 against 57/100 for PicImpact, so it is the safer default.
PicImpact ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Vert.
If you want the quickest setup, Vert is easier to run; PicImpact needs more configuration.
Vert is growing faster right now (+532 stars in 30 days).
PicImpact details →Vert details →
Swap a project
Keep PicImpact, compare it with
Keep Vert, compare it with