PicImpactvsStirling-PDF
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| PicImpact | Stirling-PDF | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 57/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #14 of 41 in Photo Management | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 1 315 | 95 252 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +2 339 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 25 |
| Latest release | v3.3.8 · 23 Sept 2026 | v3.2.2 · 24 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Stirling-PDF scores 87/100 against 57/100 for PicImpact, so it is the safer default.
Stirling-PDF ships more often: 25 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for PicImpact.
Stirling-PDF is growing faster right now (+2 339 stars in 30 days).
PicImpact details →Stirling-PDF details →
Swap a project
Keep PicImpact, compare it with
Keep Stirling-PDF, compare it with