Pi PocketvsStash
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Pi Pocket | Stash | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 50/100 | 78/100 |
| Rank in category | #40 of 120 in AI Assistant | #2 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 712 | 13 313 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +303 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 7 |
| Latest release | v0.26.0 · 27 Oct 2026 | latest_develop · 24 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Stash scores 78/100 against 50/100 for Pi Pocket, so it is the safer default.
Pi Pocket ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for Stash.
If you want the quickest setup, Stash is easier to run; Pi Pocket needs more configuration.
Stash is growing faster right now (+303 stars in 30 days).
Pi Pocket details →Stash details →
Swap a project
Keep Pi Pocket, compare it with
Keep Stash, compare it with