Pi PocketvsReactive Resume
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Pi Pocket | Reactive Resume | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 50/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #40 of 120 in AI Assistant | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 712 | 45 072 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +1 671 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 35 |
| Latest release | v0.26.0 · 27 Oct 2026 | v6.0.8 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 50/100 for Pi Pocket, so it is the safer default.
Reactive Resume ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for Pi Pocket.
Reactive Resume is growing faster right now (+1 671 stars in 30 days).
Pi Pocket details →Reactive Resume details →
Swap a project
Keep Pi Pocket, compare it with
Keep Reactive Resume, compare it with