Pi-holevsWildbox
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Pi-hole | Wildbox | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 41 in DNS | #56 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 61 544 | 134 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +482 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 10 |
| Latest release | v6.5 · 17 Oct 2026 | v0.12.2 · 6 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Shell | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Pi-hole scores 87/100 against 44/100 for Wildbox, so it is the safer default.
Wildbox ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Pi-hole.
If you want the quickest setup, Pi-hole is easier to run; Wildbox needs more configuration.
Pi-hole is growing faster right now (+482 stars in 30 days).
Pi-hole details →Wildbox details →
Swap a project
Keep Pi-hole, compare it with
Keep Wildbox, compare it with