Pi-holevsWarpgate
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Pi-hole | Warpgate | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 75/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 41 in DNS | #11 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 61 522 | 8 158 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +478 | +198 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 33 |
| Latest release | v6.5 · 17 Oct 2026 | v0.30.2 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Shell | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
Pi-hole scores 87/100 against 75/100 for Warpgate, so it is the safer default.
Warpgate ships more often: 33 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for Pi-hole.
If you want the quickest setup, Warpgate is easier to run; Pi-hole needs more configuration.
Pi-hole is growing faster right now (+478 stars in 30 days).
Pi-hole details →Warpgate details →
Swap a project
Keep Pi-hole, compare it with
Keep Warpgate, compare it with