Pi-holevsUmami
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Pi-hole | Umami | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 85/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 41 in DNS | #1 of 21 in Web analytics |
| GitHub stars | 61 536 | 39 752 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +492 | +771 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 13 |
| Latest release | v6.5 · 17 Oct 2026 | v3.4.1 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Shell | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Pi-hole scores 87/100 against 85/100 for Umami, so it is the safer default.
Umami ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Pi-hole.
If you want the quickest setup, Umami is easier to run; Pi-hole needs more configuration.
Pi-hole details →Umami details →
Swap a project
Keep Pi-hole, compare it with
Keep Umami, compare it with