docker-pi-holevsUmami
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| docker-pi-hole | Umami | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 85/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 41 in DNS | #1 of 21 in Web analytics |
| GitHub stars | 11 726 | 39 752 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +113 | +771 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 13 |
| Latest release | 2026.10.0 · 17 Oct 2026 | v3.4.1 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Shell | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Umami scores 85/100 against 77/100 for docker-pi-hole, so it is the safer default.
Umami ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for docker-pi-hole.
Umami is growing faster right now (+771 stars in 30 days).
docker-pi-hole details →Umami details →
Swap a project
Keep docker-pi-hole, compare it with
Keep Umami, compare it with