Pi-holevsstorj
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Pi-hole | storj | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 41 in DNS | #4 of 7 in Distributed Storage |
| GitHub stars | 61 544 | 3 284 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +500 | +3 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 39 |
| Latest release | v6.5 · 17 Oct 2026 | v1.165.6 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Shell | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Pi-hole scores 87/100 against 61/100 for storj, so it is the safer default.
storj ships more often: 39 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Pi-hole.
If you want the quickest setup, Pi-hole is easier to run; storj needs more configuration.
Pi-hole is growing faster right now (+500 stars in 30 days).
Pi-hole details →storj details →
Swap a project
Keep Pi-hole, compare it with
Keep storj, compare it with