docker-pi-holevsstorj
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| docker-pi-hole | storj | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 41 in DNS | #4 of 7 in Distributed Storage |
| GitHub stars | 11 728 | 3 284 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +115 | +3 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 39 |
| Latest release | 2026.10.0 · 17 Oct 2026 | v1.165.6 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Shell | Go |
Which one should you pick?
docker-pi-hole scores 77/100 against 61/100 for storj, so it is the safer default.
storj ships more often: 39 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for docker-pi-hole.
If you want the quickest setup, docker-pi-hole is easier to run; storj needs more configuration.
docker-pi-hole is growing faster right now (+115 stars in 30 days).
docker-pi-hole details →storj details →
Swap a project
Keep docker-pi-hole, compare it with
Keep storj, compare it with