Pi-holevsResonus
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Pi-hole | Resonus | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 41 in DNS | #24 of 59 in Music Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 61 545 | 212 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +483 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 9 |
| Latest release | v6.5 · 17 Oct 2026 | v0.8.4 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Other | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Shell | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Pi-hole scores 87/100 against 48/100 for Resonus, so it is the safer default.
Resonus ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Pi-hole.
If you want the quickest setup, Resonus is easier to run; Pi-hole needs more configuration.
Pi-hole is growing faster right now (+483 stars in 30 days).
Pi-hole details →Resonus details →
Swap a project
Keep Pi-hole, compare it with
Keep Resonus, compare it with