pi-dispatchvsStirling-PDF
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| pi-dispatch | Stirling-PDF | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 50/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #50 of 125 in AI | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 188 | 95 289 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +2 327 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 25 |
| Latest release | v4.3.1 · 14 Oct 2026 | v3.2.2 · 24 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Stirling-PDF scores 87/100 against 50/100 for pi-dispatch, so it is the safer default.
Stirling-PDF ships more often: 25 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for pi-dispatch.
If you want the quickest setup, Stirling-PDF is easier to run; pi-dispatch needs more configuration.
Stirling-PDF is growing faster right now (+2 327 stars in 30 days).
pi-dispatch details →Stirling-PDF details →
Swap a project
Keep pi-dispatch, compare it with
Keep Stirling-PDF, compare it with