PhotoPrismvsWarpgate
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| PhotoPrism | Warpgate | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 75/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 142 in Media Management | #11 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 40 373 | 8 159 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +140 | +199 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 33 |
| Latest release | 261007-65faaae5d · 7 Oct 2026 | v0.30.2 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
PhotoPrism scores 76/100 against 75/100 for Warpgate, so it is the safer default.
Warpgate ships more often: 33 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for PhotoPrism.
If you want the quickest setup, Warpgate is easier to run; PhotoPrism needs more configuration.
PhotoPrism details →Warpgate details →