PhotoMigratorvsSRS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| PhotoMigrator | SRS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 50/100 | 78/100 |
| Rank in category | #21 of 41 in Photo Management | #4 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 269 | 29 390 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 | +111 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 13 |
| Latest release | v4.7.0 · 19 Sept 2026 | v7.0-a3 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | C |
Which one should you pick?
SRS scores 78/100 against 50/100 for PhotoMigrator, so it is the safer default.
PhotoMigrator ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 13 for SRS.
SRS is growing faster right now (+111 stars in 30 days).
PhotoMigrator details →SRS details →
Swap a project
Keep PhotoMigrator, compare it with
Keep SRS, compare it with