PeerTubevsZero-K
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| PeerTube | Zero-K | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 | 62/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 3 in Video Hosting | #2 of 23 in Gaming |
| GitHub stars | 15 375 | 877 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +43 | +26 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 | 0 |
| Latest release | v8.3.2 · 26 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Lua |
Which one should you pick?
PeerTube scores 75/100 against 62/100 for Zero-K, so it is the safer default.
PeerTube ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Zero-K.
If you want the quickest setup, Zero-K is easier to run; PeerTube needs more configuration.
PeerTube details →Zero-K details →