hostingvsZero-K
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| hosting | Zero-K | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 27/100 | 62/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 3 in Video Hosting | #2 of 23 in Gaming |
| GitHub stars | 11 | 877 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +26 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Lua |
Which one should you pick?
Zero-K scores 62/100 against 27/100 for hosting, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, Zero-K is easier to run; hosting needs more configuration.
Zero-K is growing faster right now (+26 stars in 30 days).
hosting details →Zero-K details →