PeerTubevsUUSEC WAF
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| PeerTube | UUSEC WAF | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 3 in Video Hosting | #2 of 3 in Web Application Firewall |
| GitHub stars | 15 374 | 1 718 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +44 | +6 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 | 9 |
| Latest release | v8.3.2 · 26 Oct 2026 | v7.2.6 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | Typescript | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
PeerTube scores 75/100 against 59/100 for UUSEC WAF, so it is the safer default.
PeerTube ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for UUSEC WAF.
If you want the quickest setup, UUSEC WAF is easier to run; PeerTube needs more configuration.
PeerTube is growing faster right now (+44 stars in 30 days).
PeerTube details →UUSEC WAF details →