avideovsUUSEC WAF
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| avideo | UUSEC WAF | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 58/100 | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 36 in Video Streaming | #2 of 3 in Web Application Firewall |
| GitHub stars | 2 108 | 1 718 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +4 | +6 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 | 9 |
| Latest release | v29.6.0 · 26 Oct 2026 | v7.2.6 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Other | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | JavaScript | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
UUSEC WAF scores 59/100 against 58/100 for avideo, so it is the safer default.
avideo ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for UUSEC WAF.
If you want the quickest setup, UUSEC WAF is easier to run; avideo needs more configuration.
avideo details →UUSEC WAF details →
Swap a project
Keep avideo, compare it with
Keep UUSEC WAF, compare it with