PeerTubevsrpi-mqtt-monitor
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| PeerTube | rpi-mqtt-monitor | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 3 in Video Hosting | #58 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 15 376 | 328 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +44 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 | 8 |
| Latest release | v8.3.2 · 26 Oct 2026 | 1.4.3 · 18 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
PeerTube scores 75/100 against 51/100 for rpi-mqtt-monitor, so it is the safer default.
PeerTube ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for rpi-mqtt-monitor.
If you want the quickest setup, rpi-mqtt-monitor is easier to run; PeerTube needs more configuration.
PeerTube is growing faster right now (+44 stars in 30 days).
PeerTube details →rpi-mqtt-monitor details →