PDFMathTranslatevsToolJet
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| PDFMathTranslate | ToolJet | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 77/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 9 in Translation | #1 of 17 in Low Code |
| GitHub stars | 38 022 | 41 141 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +310 | +154 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 76 |
| Latest release | — | v3.20.251-lts · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | HTML |
Which one should you pick?
PDFMathTranslate scores 80/100 against 77/100 for ToolJet, so it is the safer default.
ToolJet ships more often: 76 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for PDFMathTranslate.
If you want the quickest setup, PDFMathTranslate is easier to run; ToolJet needs more configuration.
PDFMathTranslate is growing faster right now (+310 stars in 30 days).
PDFMathTranslate details →ToolJet details →
Swap a project
Keep PDFMathTranslate, compare it with
Keep ToolJet, compare it with