pcopyvsReactive Resume
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| pcopy | Reactive Resume | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 49/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #19 of 27 in File Sharing & Collaboration | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 428 | 45 003 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +1 630 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 34 |
| Latest release | — | v6.0.7 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 49/100 for pcopy, so it is the safer default.
Reactive Resume ships more often: 34 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for pcopy.
Reactive Resume is growing faster right now (+1 630 stars in 30 days).
pcopy details →Reactive Resume details →