payram-mcpvsxcash
Two self-hosted BTCPay Server alternatives, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| payram-mcp | xcash | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 47/100 | 46/100 |
| Rank in category | #123 of 209 in AI Agents | #29 of 42 in Cryptocurrency |
| GitHub stars | 158 | 189 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 2 |
| Latest release | — | v0.6.0 · 30 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | — | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
payram-mcp scores 47/100 against 46/100 for xcash, so it is the safer default.
xcash ships more often: 2 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for payram-mcp.
If you want the quickest setup, payram-mcp is easier to run; xcash needs more configuration.
payram-mcp details →xcash details → All BTCPay Server alternatives →