Passky-ServervsTeampass
Two self-hosted Bitwarden alternatives, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Passky-Server | Teampass | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 49/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #12 of 28 in Password Managers | #6 of 28 in Password Managers |
| GitHub stars | 242 | 1 870 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +42 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 38 |
| Latest release | v9.0.0 · 21 Oct 2026 | 3.2.3.3 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | EUPL-1.2 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | PHP |
Which one should you pick?
Teampass scores 64/100 against 49/100 for Passky-Server, so it is the safer default.
Teampass ships more often: 38 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Passky-Server.
If you want the quickest setup, Teampass is easier to run; Passky-Server needs more configuration.
Teampass is growing faster right now (+42 stars in 30 days).
Passky-Server details →Teampass details → All Bitwarden alternatives →
Swap a project
Keep Passky-Server, compare it with
Keep Teampass, compare it with