paperclipvswraft
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| paperclip | wraft | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 88/100 | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 125 in AI | #35 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 108 322 | 167 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +25 498 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 3 |
| Latest release | v2026.1012.0 · 12 Oct 2026 | v0.6.7 · 25 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Elixir |
Which one should you pick?
paperclip scores 88/100 against 44/100 for wraft, so it is the safer default.
paperclip ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for wraft.
If you want the quickest setup, paperclip is easier to run; wraft needs more configuration.
paperclip is growing faster right now (+25 498 stars in 30 days).
paperclip details →wraft details →
Swap a project
Keep paperclip, compare it with
Keep wraft, compare it with