OmniVoice-Studiovswraft
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OmniVoice-Studio | wraft | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 94/100 | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 9 in Text to Speech | #35 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 92 870 | 167 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +57 929 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 35 | 3 |
| Latest release | v0.5.7 · 26 Oct 2026 | v0.6.7 · 25 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Elixir |
Which one should you pick?
OmniVoice-Studio scores 94/100 against 44/100 for wraft, so it is the safer default.
OmniVoice-Studio ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for wraft.
If you want the quickest setup, OmniVoice-Studio is easier to run; wraft needs more configuration.
OmniVoice-Studio is growing faster right now (+57 929 stars in 30 days).
OmniVoice-Studio details →wraft details →
Swap a project
Keep OmniVoice-Studio, compare it with
Keep wraft, compare it with