paperclipvsstatic_status
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| paperclip | static_status | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 88/100 | 50/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 125 in AI | #24 of 51 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 108 263 | 732 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +26 899 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 0 |
| Latest release | v2026.1012.0 · 12 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
paperclip scores 88/100 against 50/100 for static_status, so it is the safer default.
paperclip ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for static_status.
If you want the quickest setup, static_status is easier to run; paperclip needs more configuration.
paperclip is growing faster right now (+26 899 stars in 30 days).
paperclip details →static_status details →
Swap a project
Keep paperclip, compare it with
Keep static_status, compare it with