PanWatchvsTradeSight
Two self-hosted Fintech projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| PanWatch | TradeSight | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 62/100 | 42/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Fintech | #8 of 9 in Fintech |
| GitHub stars | 2 269 | 169 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +118 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 3 |
| Latest release | 0.20.0 · 23 Oct 2026 | v1.2.0 · 14 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
PanWatch scores 62/100 against 42/100 for TradeSight, so it is the safer default.
PanWatch ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for TradeSight.
If you want the quickest setup, PanWatch is easier to run; TradeSight needs more configuration.
PanWatch is growing faster right now (+118 stars in 30 days).
PanWatch details →TradeSight details →All Fintech projects →
Swap a project
Keep PanWatch, compare it with
Keep TradeSight, compare it with