OctoBotvsTradeSight
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OctoBot | TradeSight | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 | 42/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 42 in Cryptocurrency | #8 of 9 in Fintech |
| GitHub stars | 6 873 | 169 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +266 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 3 |
| Latest release | 2.1.1 · 30 Mar 2026 | v1.2.0 · 14 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
OctoBot scores 69/100 against 42/100 for TradeSight, so it is the safer default.
OctoBot ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for TradeSight.
If you want the quickest setup, OctoBot is easier to run; TradeSight needs more configuration.
OctoBot is growing faster right now (+266 stars in 30 days).
OctoBot details →TradeSight details →
Swap a project
Keep OctoBot, compare it with
Keep TradeSight, compare it with