PanWatchvsStirling-PDF
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| PanWatch | Stirling-PDF | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 62/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Fintech | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 2 281 | 95 299 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +130 | +2 337 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 25 |
| Latest release | 0.20.0 · 23 Oct 2026 | v3.2.2 · 24 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Stirling-PDF scores 87/100 against 62/100 for PanWatch, so it is the safer default.
Stirling-PDF ships more often: 25 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for PanWatch.
If you want the quickest setup, PanWatch is easier to run; Stirling-PDF needs more configuration.
Stirling-PDF is growing faster right now (+2 337 stars in 30 days).
PanWatch details →Stirling-PDF details →
Swap a project
Keep PanWatch, compare it with
Keep Stirling-PDF, compare it with