PanWatchvsReactive Resume
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| PanWatch | Reactive Resume | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 62/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Fintech | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 2 283 | 45 040 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +132 | +1 639 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 35 |
| Latest release | 0.20.0 · 23 Oct 2026 | v6.0.8 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 62/100 for PanWatch, so it is the safer default.
Reactive Resume ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for PanWatch.
If you want the quickest setup, PanWatch is easier to run; Reactive Resume needs more configuration.
Reactive Resume is growing faster right now (+1 639 stars in 30 days).
PanWatch details →Reactive Resume details →
Swap a project
Keep PanWatch, compare it with
Keep Reactive Resume, compare it with