OctoBotvsReactive Resume
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OctoBot | Reactive Resume | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 42 in Cryptocurrency | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 6 872 | 45 040 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +257 | +1 639 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 35 |
| Latest release | 2.1.1 · 30 Mar 2026 | v6.0.8 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 69/100 for OctoBot, so it is the safer default.
Reactive Resume ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for OctoBot.
Reactive Resume is growing faster right now (+1 639 stars in 30 days).
OctoBot details →Reactive Resume details →
Swap a project
Keep OctoBot, compare it with
Keep Reactive Resume, compare it with