PairDropvsZabbix
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| PairDrop | Zabbix | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 | 75/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 86 in File Sharing | #13 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 11 720 | 6 522 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +253 | +110 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Go Template |
Which one should you pick?
PairDrop and Zabbix score the same (75/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.
If you want the quickest setup, PairDrop is easier to run; Zabbix needs more configuration.
PairDrop is growing faster right now (+253 stars in 30 days).
PairDrop details →Zabbix details →
Swap a project
Keep PairDrop, compare it with
Keep Zabbix, compare it with