PaddleOCRvszookeeper
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| PaddleOCR | zookeeper | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 85/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 4 in OCR | #1 of 8 in Configuration Management |
| GitHub stars | 91 881 | 12 827 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +440 | +17 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 0 |
| Latest release | v3.7.0 · 11 Jun 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Java |
Which one should you pick?
PaddleOCR scores 85/100 against 73/100 for zookeeper, so it is the safer default.
PaddleOCR ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for zookeeper.
PaddleOCR is growing faster right now (+440 stars in 30 days).
PaddleOCR details →zookeeper details →
Swap a project
Keep PaddleOCR, compare it with
Keep zookeeper, compare it with